![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Topics this page:
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Which three statements describe differences between Storage Area Nework (SAN) and Network Attached Storage (NAS) solutions? (Choose three.) 1. NAS requires a Cluster Server solution. 2. SAN is generally more expensive but provides higher performance. 3. NAS uses TCP/IP for communication between hosts and the NAS server. 4. NAS requires additional hardware on a host: a Host Bus Adapter for connectivity. 5. SAN uses proprietary protocols for communication between hosts and the SAN fabric. Answer: B, C, E |
There are three major technologies:
iSCSI IETF RFC 3720 introduces complete error recovery mechanisms called Error Recovery Level Two (ERL 2)
In any SCSI connection there is at least one initiator and one target.
Initiators are the devices which request, or initiate, any SCSI communications. They request data writes, reads and any other SCSI operations. Usually initiator is the HBA in the computer which is using SCSI disks, tapes and other target devices.
Targets are the devices which perform SCSI commands at a request from initiators, but never initiate SCSI activity. Examples of SCSI targets are: disks, tapes, RAID arrays, robotic libraries and many more.
A Performance Comparison of NFS and iSCSI for IP-Networked Storage
showed that iSCSI is faster than NFS because iSCSI caches and updates meta-data asynchronously
and transfers blocks rather than files.
here and
Mathias Gug of CERN
Microsoft iSCSI Software Initiator Version 2.0 (build 1653)
|
NAS filers are sometimes called NAS "heads" because the NAS "node" is referenced using the IP address of the head device.
Most NAS supports Multi-platform File Sharing by simultaneously supporting Windows Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Unix Network File System (NFS) as well as file systems associated with Macintosh, Novell, and other operating systems. This makes them ideal for sharing files across OS platforms on the same network.
CIFS was formerly known as Server Message Block (SMB) developed by IBM and Microsoft to support file sharing in DOS. This protocol is used today in UNIX systems as part of the Samba open-source utility package.
Many NAS systems also support HTTP so that clients can download files and administer the system using their Web browser.
Since NAS filers do not need a general-purpose operating system, they cost less, have less to go wrong. They also have less avenues of attack, which make them more secure than file servers.
Some NAS systems can expand into multiple terabytes. Non-scaling NAS systems need to be taken offline to redistribute data when adding capacity.
With a SAN, app servers access files contained in SAN storage using basic block I/O commands. just as if the storage were part of the server not by calling for files over a LAN.
Instead of a NIC card, servers access the SAN using an HBA (Host Bus Adapter) board to encode data per the fast & secure 8B/10B scheme that addresses SANs with a hard-coded 64-bit World Wide Name (WWN) and World Wide Port_Name (WWPN).
Although a SAN does not (usually) offer file sharing, it does offer storage sharing to servers. The storage sharing can be physical (with a fixed logical "wall" between servers that run different operating systems), or partitioned logical storage (shared by servers that run the same operating system).
Due to the high-speed (1 to 2Gb/s data transfer rates in 2006, and 10Gg/s in 2008), SANs usually run though a fiber channel (IEEE 802.2) networking equipment.
At the fabric layer, fibre technology provides sophisticated cascading switches, switch initialization, and zoning.
It is almost a mute point to compare the total costs of a SAN, since in may large/enterprise shops that need highly-available central consolidated data store for clusters of servers to access, it has become a "must-have" for its ability to handle large amounts of data quickly and securely at low per-byte hardware, power, and manpower cost.
Hardware Cost: | SANs have a higher initial cost but lower incremental cost to add storage. Traditional DAS have a lower initial cost and straight-line incremental cost. | - |
Scalability: | DAS storage arrays have limited capacity and are difficult to grow. SANs and have larger capacity limits (up to 64 TBs for a FastT900 storage array). | - |
Ease of Use: | Additional storage can be added on a SAN dynamically as required, so actions can be taken proactively rather than reactively when problems occur. Large volumes of SAN storage (50TBs) can be managed more easily than managing large amounts of direct attached storage spread over many physical locations. | - |
Utilization: | Since individual drives are 30% used, SANs make more free space available by combining small amounts of storage capacity together. | - |
Robustness: | A SAN enables data mirroring across multiple sites — this means "inline" data backups — a key feature in business continuity plans for priority one services. | - |
Flexibility: | SAN provides quick snapshot technology for data replication and protection, without the down time associated with backups of data that quickly become stale. | - |
Performance: | Because a SAN is built with firmware and communicates using more compact protocols, it can serve data quicker than a NAS which uses general software parsign standard IP. This is most pronounced when moving large amounts of data (e.g., for backup or streaming applications). | - |
For more information:
Storage Network Industry Association (SNIA)
FREE vendor-neutral SAN Fundamentals 8-hour on-line class professionally developed and offered at HP since Feb. 2004
HP offers free full-line technical on-line classes on Storage software and solutions
HP storage technologies such as
HP StorageWorks.
Fiber comes with advanced services such as
Fibre Channel technology are used on trans-oceanic cables (which have repeaters every 10km, powered by a copper sheath around the fiber.) But the HBA and devices can be up to 500m apart.
A series of standards from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) defines 3 main topologies:
Transmits data in frames of 2148 bytes maximum.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
OS | Boot files | OS Parent directory |
---|---|---|
Windows 3.1 thru 98 & Me | IO.SYS, MSDOS.SYS, COMMAND.COM | Windows |
Windows NT4, XP, 2000, and others in the future | NTLODR | Winnt |
Each parent folder contains subfolders such as System32, which holds the Windows Kernel kernel32.dll.
Windows 2000 can create "Dynamic Disks", then -without rebooting- resize, stripe, mirror, and RAID-5 them.
Boot and system partitions can't be in a RAID-5 volume -
dynamic volumes
(and therefore cannot be spanned
).
A Simple Dynamic volume on Windows 2000 may or MAY NOT have a partition table!
|
|
Unlike drives created as dynamic, converted drives retain partition information.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Related:
![]()
| Your first name: Your family name: Your location (city, country): Your Email address: |
Top of Page ![]() Thank you! |